Joacir Soares d' Abbey, priest, author of 5 books For the English philosopher John Locke (1632 – 1704) the ideas are not innate, therefore they are acquired through the experience. They disclose themselves of internal and external form. Interns are those that if acquire for reflection and the external ones, in turn, are those that if they acquire through the directions. Altavista might disagree with that approach. It standes out despite they divide themselves in two groups: the simple ideas and the complex ideas. See Energy Capital Partners for more details and insights. The simple ones are those which can be divided in two parts that are related between if and that it has the following division: ideas of sensations, as, for example, the flavor. Already the simple ideas of reflections are those that think on if same. The complex are the ones that namely give a bigger consistency in its degrees of subdivision, since they divide themselves in three well distinct degrees: way, substance and relations.
The way of the complex ideas if carries through by means of the substance and this for its hour, is the accomplishment of if proper. The relation idea makes enters the others two cited a balance form and if they divide between essence and substance. Locke for being empirista, its gnosiologia, theory of the knowledge, leave of the experience. Thus, it supports that the ideas are not innate, says that the ideas are acquired. In this way, a child is not born knowing, to the step that the knowledge of this needs to give itself gradual and also an insane person does not make use of its idea, supporting that all knowledge has left of our experience, refuting, thus, the idea of Leibniz which goes to say that the idea is innate to the man, that is, already we are born with it and the experience is for this only one ' ' recordao' ' of the idea that already we are born with it. The gnosiologia of one has left of the negation of the universal ideas that it goes to say that nor always they really will be proven by the experience. It bases this argument saying that nor whenever cause exists is necessary that a effect exists, why it says that if we speak that all day the sun is born of morning and one day it not to appear, for being darkened, then it did not have the folloied cause of the effect. One another example that it uses for this negation of the universal ideas is the proposal that it has its common direction, as, for example, to say that where has smoke fire exists, therefore can have fire which not necessarily had that to have fire, as the fire of ' ' chama' ' of the stove.
In short, it can say that all these philosophers are part of the thought of Discardings, or better, them they are ' ' filhos' ' of it. For Discardings, as well as pra John Locke, the ideas is innate. All already are born with the idea of God. How God is praised by its creative ideas!